Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1526

reference
240-tree-1
name
1526
tree-preservation-order

undefined

240-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.005420 50.854406)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.005349 50.854399,-1.005352 50.854413,-1.005362 50.854425,-1.005377 50.854436,-1.005397 50.854442,-1.005419 50.854444,-1.005441 50.854442,-1.005461 50.854436,-1.005477 50.854426,-1.005487 50.854414,-1.005491 50.854400,-1.005488 50.854386,-1.005478 50.854374,-1.005462 50.854364,-1.005443 50.854357,-1.005421 50.854355,-1.005399 50.854357,-1.005379 50.854363,-1.005363 50.854373,-1.005352 50.854385,-1.005349 50.854399)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL